Overhearing two nurses in the hospital lounge
They were taking a short break from their caring duties, the
empty sandwich boxes on the table testifying to a quick lunch. They briefly
interrupted their conversation for a kindly nod while I sat down with my book
about the 18
th C painter
Watteau,
cautiously handling my right arm in a
sling (1).
“She did seem more competent than him. More responsible. How
can they trust that guy?” the youngest nurse wondered.
The elder nurse shrugged : “it’s always the big shots with
the biggest mouths that win.”
The youngest nodded vigorously “yeah, like that bunga bunga
guy in Italy. I never understood how the Italians could put up so long with
him. “ She fiddled with her smartphone “ hey , look here , photos from his
apartment in New York – 'the interior architect wanted to recreate a Versailles
atmosphere' - jeezes, does that guy think he’s Louis XIV or what? “
Flashing a weary smile, the elder nurse replied “well, he sure has the
puffy pride to match. But we’d better hurry now, time’s up”
Contemplating a picture of Louis XIV
I was reading about Watteau’s pictures of unheroic,
introverted soldiers– an interiority far removed from the pump & circumstance of the Versailles
court. But showing Watteau in context, the book also explained about
his contemporary, Louis
XIV, who with his reckless wars caused hundreds of thousands people to die and plunged
France into a deep debt crisis.
So, sitting in that hospital lounge, plunged into art
history, I was quite startled by the nurse’s comparison of a 21st
Century, democratically chosen US president with an 18th
Century French autocrat.
But contemplating the famous
Louis XIV portrait (by Hyacinthe Rigaud) , I couldn’t but conclude: yes, indeed,
there’s the same conceit, the same narcissism, the same strutting on the stage.The same quest for personal glorification.
Does this mean that Democracy cannot do a better job at protecting us from
the sense of entitlement of these strutting males than the Ancien Régime?
A horribly defeatist thought – which I must & will
banish. (But then again, pugnacious Putin was democratically chosen, too)
A jubilant Reagonomics enthusiast
In a financial paper I read an illuminating interview with a
jubilant Arthur Laffer (former economic advisor to Ronald Reagan). At last
again a man to his liking in the White House! “This is brilliant, especially
since the Republicans also control the Congress. This means lower taxes,
abolishing Obamacare, scrapping the Dodd-Frank banking regulation”
Aha, so that’s why Wall Street kept its nerves – greed is
gonna be good again!
Elsewhere I read about how leading conservative business men
are eagerly lining up to offer their services to the new president “he may have
said some rash things during the campaign, but he’s a real business man, he’ll
take our sound business advise”.
It will be interesting to see what happens: lower taxes combined
with higher infrastructure spending, higher import tariffs on, say , Chinese
imports, higher inflation, a soaring budget deficit (with the snubbed Chinese
probably less inclined to continue
financing it). After an initial boost to
growth, how can this recipe durably boost standards of living? Will this bring
back factory jobs to the US? (And what about the rest of the world). Will this
bring the lower & middle classes what they hope for?
Will the new
administration care at all? Or shall we
find the winners rather among the above mentioned leading conservative business
men, including the new president (who, so I read, owes his fortune more to inherited
wealth & relations than to superior business acumen & entrepreneurship).
On the ethical & social front, too, it will be
interesting (and scary) to see what will happen. Indeed, how convenient for the new president to buy
the loyalty of the evangelicals by pursuing their agenda.
So, now what?
How to domesticate globalisation and complexity? Why can’t
we have more responsible politicians addressing the current discontents &
fears, without resorting to the usual political party-mantra’s? Why must
reckless, self-interested, conceited politicians take the lead - irresponsible politicians who cater to our most dangerous instincts.
Can we no longer escape a clash of extreme standpoints? Have we perhaps reached such a level of
bewildering complexity & frustration that we now all just recoil and
massively reject nuance and gradualism?
But if change cannot be gradual, it will come with a
bang. We only need to look at the 1st
half of the 20th century to be very afraid of that.
1) Explanatory Note : on what I was doing in that
hospital, overhearing a political conversation and contemplating a picture of Louis
XIV.
My cycling days are over (my heart sinks as I type this). Neither caution nor a fluorescent yellow
helmet & vest could shield me from another accident. It happened on a
lovely autumn Saturday, while I was cycling on a quiet road along a park. All
of a sudden a car materialised where it shouldn’t have been – cutting a corner.
So I braked violently, my wheel slipping on one of those lovely gleaming yellow
autumn leaves. I was projected forward and made a brutal smack on the tarmac,
right on the tip of my elbow. Then a second smack on my head, luckily amortized
by the helmet.
I sat on the ground, dazed for a moment. Then I did manage to scramble
back on my feet. The car driver had braked too and got out of his car, apologetic
& full of concern. Picking up my
bike, he inquired whether I was ok. I
thought I was, hoping it was just a bruised elbow, just a matter of pulling
myself together. I let the chauffeur drive off and tried to mount my bike
again – a sharp pain in my elbow
signalled this was not a good idea. I called C, whose phone battery was apparently
down. So I walked all the way home, an
hour’s walk, a miserable walk, bike at hand.
Home at last I took off my jacket and saw a swelling the size of a giant
premium pear.
Only then I realized I had to concede defeat. Again a broken limb, only 4 years after the
previous accident. No way to escape from the rational conclusion: henceforth no
more cycling for me in Brussels..
Arriving at the hospital, I felt crushed and most of all ashamed,
having to call upon their services again with a broken limb. But praise be (again, too) to this hospital
staff – friendly, professional, efficient.
They gave me a provisional plaster on Saturday and swiftly arranged for
an operation the next Tuesday so as to mend me again.
Despite all the inevitable pain & discomfort linked to
the accident and the surgery – this hospital stay was also an uplifting
reminder that diversity doesn’t need to be the fateful menace to social
cohesion, as it has come to be perceived in these perplexing times. Far from me
to pitch the Ixelles hospital as a social Utopia in the middle of “hellhole Brussels”
(infamous epithet coined by the future US president). But the fact remains that
I’ve been treated there (again) with outstanding kindness & professionalism
by a staggeringly diverse hospital staff, all working together harmoniously.
Apart from the swift action of the emergency doctor with
an Arab sounding name and the unflappable calm of the surgeon of German descent
, I’d like to mention specifically the hilarious sense of humour of the anesthesiologist
– a black female doctor who managed to make me shake with laughter while I lay
helplessly on the operating table, waiting to be put to sleep.
And heartfelt thanks, too,
to the quiet male nurse of Mediterranean descent who all along a
miserable night refilled the drip with glucose and painkillers and assuaged my
worst nightly fears. Not to forget the Asian nurse who taught me how to put my
arm in a sling without breaking it again.